AI Systems
Evaluate cost, ROI, and operational risk of enterprise AI systems.
Decision tools for enterprise architecture. Each tool turns a recurring architecture question into a structured evaluation for comparing options, surfacing trade-offs, and testing assumptions.
These tools help analyze architectural trade-offs and complexity in enterprise systems before teams make large platform commitments.
These tools are built to support decision-making before major commitments. They do not replace architectural review or professional judgment.
Architecture decisions often involve uncertainty and incomplete information.
This lab structures decisions into four stages:
Each stage has dedicated tools that help teams evaluate trade-offs before committing to architecture.
Active tools are grouped by architecture domain. All tools are publicly available and free to use.
Evaluate cost, ROI, and operational risk of enterprise AI systems.
Estimate operational and infrastructure cost exposure for enterprise AI systems before production scaling.
Evaluate expected return on enterprise AI initiatives across build-versus-buy options.
Assess enterprise readiness for responsible AI deployment across governance, reliability, and compliance.
Evaluate system complexity, integration risk, and architectural sustainability.
Run shared architecture inputs once and evaluate complexity-index and over-architecture diagnostics together.
Measure weighted architecture complexity drivers and technical debt pressure.
Detect when cloud design complexity exceeds workload needs and team readiness.
Evaluate operational complexity of enterprise integration landscapes across systems, patterns, and governance maturity.
Estimate long-term technology vendor dependency risk across proprietary APIs, portability constraints, and integration depth.
Evaluate data platform architecture choices and governance alignment.
Evaluate architectural trade-offs within major enterprise platforms.
These tools help architects reason about platform strategy, ecosystem complexity, and architectural constraints introduced by large enterprise platforms.
Current coverage focuses on Salesforce Data Cloud (Data 360) architecture decisions. Future platform ecosystems may include Snowflake, Databricks, and ServiceNow.
Estimate Salesforce Data Cloud and AI consumption credits to plan platform usage.
Evaluate Data Cloud One, existing-org, and dedicated-org provisioning strategies for Salesforce Data 360.
Recommend Data 360 ingestion and federation patterns based on latency, volume, and governance constraints.
Simulate independent, shared, and hybrid Data 360 multi-org strategies across governance and reporting needs.
Model Agentforce Flex Credit consumption across agent designs, billing models, and voice deployments to surface cost traps before you go to production.
Generate architecture decision summaries with rationale, trade-offs, risk areas, and governance notes.
Current tools focus on architectural decisions related to Salesforce Data Cloud. Additional Salesforce architecture decision tools may be added in the future, including org strategy, integration architecture, and platform governance.
Evaluate cost, ROI, and operational risk of enterprise AI systems.
Evaluate system complexity, integration risk, and architectural sustainability.
Evaluate data platform architecture choices and governance alignment.
Evaluate architectural trade-offs within major enterprise platforms.
Architecture decisions often involve uncertainty and incomplete information.
The tools in Sarfarajey Lab are experiments in making architecture reasoning more structured. They transform qualitative architecture discussions into quantitative signals that help teams compare options and evaluate trade-offs.
The tools in this lab provide structured decision models designed to help evaluate architectural trade-offs.
Results are directional guidance and should not replace professional architectural analysis or enterprise architecture review.
Architectural decisions should always consider organizational context, operational constraints, and real-world implementation factors.
The models used in these tools simplify complex systems and assumptions may not fully capture every real-world constraint.
Use the outputs as guidance to support architectural reasoning rather than definitive answers.
Platform examples used in this lab illustrate architectural trade-offs across real-world ecosystems. Sarfarajey Lab is vendor-neutral and not affiliated with or endorsed by any platform provider.